Building the Salem Witchcraft GIS

Next: Results, Error and Offset | Previous Screen | Table of Contents | Return to Start

Digitizing the Upham Map

K. Registration of the Upham Map

We performed several different registrations of Upham's map, in order to examine the effect of using certain control points and leaving out others. Successive attempts allowed us to determine which points provided the best match and fit of the map to the real world data we had to work with.


ABOVE: the navigational windows in ArcInfo that enable overlay of control points with the map image, enabling the user to create links between the two. The two smaller windows at right allow the GIS technician to control the areas that will be overlaid. The area at left is where the links are drawn, by clicking the mouse first on the target point, and then on its corresponding control point. The area boxed in red is show in detail below
	LEFT: point A on the map image is being linked to the control point (represented by the purple line) to the control point represented by the "+" sign.

Ultimately we used only nine of the sixteen available control points to register the map. The remaining seven, we felt, represented large areas that we could not well match with a point, or represented points on Upham's map that appeared to be imprecise or inaccurate. The remaining nine points provide enough geographic spread to ensure accuracy.

**Control Points Used in Registration of Upham's Map**
ID#	Mapsymbol	name
95	95	Rebecca Nurse House
93	93	Sarah Holten House
68	68	Bridget Bishop (Edward Bishop)House
48	48	Parsonage
151	151	Jonathan Corwin House
185	none	Will's Hill
107	107	John Hale House
188	none	Humphrey's Pond Island
186	none	Wenham Lake

Next: Results, Error and Offset | Previous Screen | Table of Contents | Return to Start

Salem Witchcraft Papers | March 1692 Animated | The Putnam Family

Geostat | IATH | ECAI | U of Virginia Library|U of Virginia

LAST MODIFIED:
MAINTAINED BY: geostat@virginia.edu